ReviewJournal of human hypertension2026
"Efficacy and safety of low-dose combination (Quad pill and Triple pill) therapy versus standard of care and placebo in controlling hypertension: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials".
Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet the management remains suboptimal especially with monotherapy. Recently, low-dose triple and quadruple (quadpill) combinations have emerged as a promising therapeutic advancement resulting in control of hypertension. However, there still remains controversy around the long-term safety and efficacy of these therapies. We conducted an updated meta-analysis on the influence of these combinations on hypertension control. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to 2020 PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO. An extensive search on several databases including PubMed, Google scholar, C , and Cochrane Central Register of Trials. Primary outcome assessed was reduction in systolic blood pressure, and proportion of participants in range and secondary outcomes included: reduction in diastolic blood pressure, along with various safety outcomes. Low-dose combination significantly reduced systolic BP as compared to the placebo at 4-12 weeks (MD -14.97 mmHg), along with sustained reduction at 6 months (MD -6.58 mmHg). Patients who received low-dose combinations were more likely to reach target BP < 140/90, compared with a placebo drug (RR 2.18) and standard therapy (RR 1.37). Dizziness, headaches and pedal edema were noted more frequently in the intervention group, while MSK complaints were higher in the control populations. Our study's findings suggest that low-dose combinations with triple and quadruple therapies are significantly more efficacious in reducing systolic and diastolic BPs of adult populations. However, generally higher adverse events were noted for the intervention group receiving low-dose combination therapy.
Identifiers
42542446What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.