Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42542987›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2026

Post-Outbreak Disease Risk Management Strategy for Sand Lizard Reintroductions.

A W Sainsbury, S K Macgregor, S Kunjamma John, G Peniche, N Moulton, J Foster, R J Vaughan-Higgins, F M Molenaar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A W SainsburyInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK. tonysainsbury@wild-animal-health.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5397-287X
S K MacgregorInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
S Kunjamma JohnInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
G PenicheInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
N MoultonAmphibian and Reptile Conservation, 744 Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, BH7 6BZ, UK.
J FosterAmphibian and Reptile Conservation, 744 Christchurch Road, Bournemouth, BH7 6BZ, UK.
R J Vaughan-HigginsInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
F M MolenaarInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) is an endangered native species in England, typically persisting in small, fragmented populations. A conservation translocation (reintroduction) programme has contributed to recovery by establishing new populations and regaining the lost range of the species. The translocation of wild animals has been associated with severe epidemic disease giving rise to extinctions, and therefore, caution is required in the planning of future translocations. In line with International Union for the Conservation of Nature recommendations, a disease risk analysis was conducted on the sand lizard reintroduction programme in 2003. A disease outbreak, associated with the bacterium Serratia marcescens, occurred in a sand lizard colony being prepared for reintroduction in 2004, and S. marcescens had not previously been recorded in reptiles in England. In order to reassess disease risk management methods, efforts were made to establish whether this bacterium was a naturally occurring species in UK sand lizards, and a survey was conducted on 194 free-living, wild sand lizards from a population that had not received reintroduced sand lizards. Cloacal swabs, collected from the free-living sand lizards, were cultured for bacteria, and S. marcescens was recorded at 1.5% prevalence (n = 194). Given this finding, the risk from disease, associated with S. marcescens, in the reintroduction of sand lizards from the captive colony was considered low, and conservation translocation continued. The practical, feasible disease risk management methods, described in this paper, can be utilised to reduce the risks from disease of conservation translocations and safeguard future populations.

Indexed as

Conservation translocationDisease risk analysisEpidemiologySauria

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.