Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543801›Full record

ReviewJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Gut Microbiome and ADHD: A Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence and Practice Implications.

Kinga Sadowska, Kathryn Hart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kinga SadowskaUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5348-9510
Kathryn HartUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-9866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis narrative review evaluates the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotic interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in both medicated and drug-naïve paediatric and adult populations and assesses the implications for clinical dietetic practice.

designA narrative review synthesizing randomized controlled trials and observational microbiome studies in paediatric and adult populations, specifically distinguishing between probiotic monotherapy and adjunctive protocols.

resultsObservational data confirm gut microbiome alterations in ADHD populations, although specific bacterial signatures vary across studies. Evidence from treatment trials demonstrates that the efficacy of probiotics as monotherapy for core ADHD symptoms remains inconclusive. However, specific adjunctive trials combining probiotics with conventional medication have reported preliminary positive findings on symptom reduction, though results remain heterogeneous. Adult evidence is sparse but indicates potential benefits for emotional dysregulation in specific contexts.

conclusionsThis review concludes that current data do not support universal probiotic supplementation or routine clinical recommendation. However, when families inquire about complementary approaches, the existing literature enables evidence informed guidance within a shared decision-making framework that acknowledges the preliminary nature of current findings and sets realistic expectations.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAdultChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicADHDadjunctive therapygut‐brain axisgut microbiomeprobioticssynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID42543801
PMCPMC13430089

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.