Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544294›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Refining Accelerometer-Based Animal Behaviour Classifications With Sequence-Informed Post-Processing.

Oakleigh Wilson, Hui Yu, David Schoeman, Gabriella Sparkes, Christofer Clemente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oakleigh WilsonSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9082-3664
Hui YuSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia.
David SchoemanSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland Australia.
Gabriella SparkesSchool of the Environment University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Christofer ClementeSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supervised machine learning has been used to detect fine-scale behaviours from animal-borne accelerometers by dividing the continuous sequences of behaviour into discrete segments and classifying each with a distinct behavioural category. This approach, while widely implemented, discards the sequential information available in the temporal ordering of the behavioural series. 'Post-processing' (smoothing and error correction made after the initial classifications) can be used to improve the accuracy of the original predictions by learning from the natural transitions and durations of behaviours. While broadly implemented across other classification domains, this technique has been underutilised for accelerometer-based animal behaviour classification. In this paper, we compare the performance of five different post-processors (modal, duration-based, transition-based, Hidden Markov Model, and a Naive Bayes smoother) against the original predictions from the base classifier across 15 animal accelerometer datasets across 13 species. Overall, while there was no single post-processing method that was optimal in every dataset, we find Bayesian smoothing to have the best overall performance improvement (average 6.4% increase in

Indexed as

behaviourbiologgingclassificationmachine learningpost‐processing

Identifiers

PMID42544294
PMCPMC13429299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.