Evidence mapPaperPMID 42544352Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Current Evidence, Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions of Rotator Cuff Failure: A Systematic Review.

Maithili V Potdar, Sandeep Shinde, Akshaya V Joshi, Sanjaykumar Patil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maithili V PotdarDepartment of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Sandeep ShindeDepartment of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Akshaya V JoshiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Sanjaykumar PatilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears (RTs) are among the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions worldwide, imposing substantial burdens of chronic pain, functional limitation, and socioeconomic cost. The underlying pathophysiology is multifactorial, encompassing progressive mechanical attrition, tendon degeneration, and irreversible biological deterioration, including muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration, and altered glenohumeral kinematics that may ultimately culminate in cuff tear arthropathy. The central clinical challenge lies in stratifying patients appropriately and selecting the optimal treatment strategy before irreversible structural compromise renders either conservative or surgical intervention ineffective. This systematic review comprehensively synthesizes the available evidence on rotator cuff failure, evaluating its etiology, natural history, diagnostic accuracy of modern imaging modalities, and long-term functional outcomes, with direct comparison of conservative versus surgical management strategies and an assessment of emerging rehabilitation adjuncts. Adhering strictly to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was performed across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies of adult patients with confirmed rotator cuff pathology diagnosed by MRI or high-resolution ultrasonography. Data extraction prioritized validated functional shoulder outcome scores. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs and the Risk of Bias-I (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized observational studies. Twelve studies meeting full eligibility criteria were included. Multi-center RCTs and cohort studies demonstrate equivalent functional outcomes between conservative care and surgical repair for small-to-medium degenerative tears. Longitudinal cohort data identify a critical dose-effect threshold at 16 physical therapy sessions, beyond which further functional benefit plateaus. Arthroscopic repair delivers outcomes equivalent to open techniques with substantially reduced surgical morbidity. Emerging adjuncts, including pulley exercises at six weeks post-repair, blood flow restriction training, ultrasound-guided dry needling, and asynchronous telemedicine, demonstrate significant improvements in pain modulation, range of motion, and therapeutic adherence. Optimal management of rotator cuff failure demands an individualized, milestone-driven approach. Structured conventional therapy constitutes an evidence-supported first-line intervention for chronic degenerative tears; however, patients who fail to achieve functional milestones after conservative treatment require a timely transition to arthroscopic evaluation to prevent irreversible structural decline. Surgical approach, suture anchor technique, tissue biology, and postoperative protocol adherence are each determinative of repair success. Integration of advanced biological, digital, and remote rehabilitation modalities further bridges the gap between radiographic severity and real-world patient functionality.

Indexed as

arthroscopic rotator cuff repairconservative managementphysical therapyrotator cuff failurerotator cuff tear

Identifiers

PMID42544352
PMCPMC13429212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.