ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2026
Experience and attitudes toward blended tube feeding in Dutch pediatric healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlended tube feeding (BTF)-enteral nutrition based on whole foods-is increasingly adopted as an alternative to commercial formulas in children requiring long-term tube feeding. While parents often initiate this practice, healthcare professionals are crucial for its safe and effective implementation. This study explored the perspectives of Dutch pediatric healthcare professionals regarding BTF to identify knowledge gaps and support future clinical guidance.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional survey in 252 participants based in the Netherlands from February to May 2025. The self-developed 30-item questionnaire addressed BTF knowledge, attitudes, and experiences. Responses were analyzed descriptively.
resultsA total of 252 respondents completed the survey, primarily pediatric dietitians (n = 89) and pediatricians (n = 64). Familiarity with BTF was high (82%), and 56% had cared for children receiving it, most commonly via gastrostomy, although practices varied. Attitudes were generally positive (65%), particularly among dietitians (81%). Reported benefits included improved feeding tolerance (79%), reduced reflux/vomiting (72%), and improved stool patterns (67%); while caregiver burden (61%) and perceived parental insecurity regarding nutrition (28%) were the main challenges. Awareness of the 2022 national BTF position paper was low (54%), especially among physicians (20%), although 77% of healthcare professionals expressed interest in further education.
conclusionThis nationwide survey reveals high familiarity and positive attitudes toward BTF among pediatric healthcare professionals but considerable variation in practice and limited awareness of existing guidelines. Future interventional studies, evidence-based recommendations and professional training are needed to support consistent, family-centered implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.