Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544779›Full record

ArticleJournal of paediatrics and child health2026

Developmental Care and Follow-Up of Infants Exposed to Alcohol and/or Drugs in Utero: An Australian Benchmarking Survey.

Marla Laverie, Catherine Clark, Millicent Cram, Angelique Brandt, Kelly J Bower, Anna Tottman, Rochelle Lester, Julianne Pegler, Alicia J Spittle, Amanda K L Kwong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marla LaverieThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Catherine ClarkThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Millicent CramThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Angelique BrandtThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kelly J BowerThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anna TottmanRoyal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9944-5402
Rochelle LesterRoyal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-7513
Julianne PeglerRoyal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Alicia J SpittleThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Amanda K L KwongThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2875-6697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInfants exposed to alcohol and/or drugs (AoD) in utero are at considerable risk for developmental complications which are amenable to early intervention. There are no published guidelines in Australia for the allied health care of infants and toddlers (0-2 years) who have been exposed to AoD in utero. This study aimed to explore the current service delivery and follow-up health services available across Australia for this high-risk population group.

methodsA custom-designed survey was distributed via email to the leading contact of hospitals based in Australia that offered a neonatal-based follow-up service (n = 43). Reminders to prompt completion were emailed out at regular intervals over a two-month period.

resultsA total of 15 of 43 invited services (35%) provided responses with only 3 of 15 (20%) offering targeted care for infants exposed to AoD and 5 (33%) using any formal developmental or screening tools with this population. Responses indicated inconsistencies with allied health involvement including professions involved and time points for follow-up care. Funding was highlighted as a key barrier to conducting follow-up assessments, with 12 of 15 (80%) health services reporting they received no dedicated funding for this population.

conclusionWithin the responding services, our data reflects the lack of consensus on any standardised process for assessment or follow-up service delivery for this high-risk patient population. Although the response rate was low, it is consistent with previous health professional survey research. There remains a need for further research and the development of clinical care guidelines on best standard protocols for assessing and supporting the development of infants exposed to AoD in utero.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAustraliaChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancySurveys and Questionnairesalcohol and drug exposurebenchmarkfollow‐upneonatologysurvey

Identifiers

PMID42544779
PMCPMC13617233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.