ArticlePsychology and aging2026
A continuous-time approach to short-term activity-cognition dynamics.
Article in Psychology and aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A continuous-time approach to short-term activity-cognition dynamics.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior research suggests that naturally occurring leisure activities may exert short-term, time-lagged benefits on cognition over hours in middle- and older aged adults. We extended this work by examining short-term activity-cognition dynamics in two ambulatory assessment studies of U.S. adults spanning diverse demographic backgrounds, using a continuous-time modeling framework. Both studies involved repeated smartphone-based assessments of leisure activities (cognitive [Study 1 only], social, physical, and passive) and cognitive performance (processing speed and spatial working memory) over 2 weeks. Study 1 included 288 older adults (
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.