Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545461›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Cardiac blood phenethylamine as a potential biomarker for post-mortem interval in forensic autopsy cases.

Akina Nara, Chiho Yamada, Yu Kozakai, Manami Suyama, Tetsuya Takagi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akina NaraDivision of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan. akina@tohoku-mpu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-1377
Chiho YamadaDivision of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan.
Yu KozakaiDivision of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan.
Manami SuyamaDivision of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan.
Tetsuya TakagiDivision of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In forensic autopsy, estimating post-mortem interval (PMI) requires a combined analysis of macroscopic findings with histopathological, biochemical, and toxicological data. However, accurate assessment of PMI remains challenging, particularly in cases with advanced decomposition. Phenethylamine (PEA), a putrefactive amine, has been identified in various post-mortem samples including blood, tissues, and body surfaces. This study aimed to evaluate the association between cardiac blood PEA concentrations collected during forensic autopsies and PMI in forensic autopsy cases. Cardiac blood samples from 361 forensic autopsy cases were collected over 6 years and analyzed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PMI ranged from 0.5 to 150 days (median: 1.29), whereas PEA levels ranged from 0 to 115.2 µg/mL (median: 0 µg/mL). When all cases were included, a moderate association was observed between PEA concentration and PMI (R

Indexed as

Cardiac bloodDecomposed corpsesForensic autopsyPhenethylaminePost-mortem interval

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.