ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
A kinetic-based framework for the selection of in vitro osteoarthritis models: integrating temporal dynamics of inflammatory inducers.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro osteoarthritis (OA) models are widely used for mechanistic studies. However, inconsistencies in induction protocols limit reproducibility and translational relevance. A systematic comparison of inflammatory inducers based on their temporal dynamics remains elusive. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify the most commonly used inflammatory inducers in vitro OA models. The prevalence of each inducer was quantified. In addition, a qualitative mechanistic synthesis was performed by integrating representative studies reporting temporal molecular profiles to construct conceptual kinetic patterns. Based on this synthesis, a kinetic-based framework was developed to compare inducer-specific temporal characteristics. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) was the most frequently used inducer (62.12%), followed by lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 9.60%) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, 7.58%). Temporal synthesis suggested a biphasic enzymatic response characterized by early ADAMTS-5 induction (approximately 6-12 h) and subsequent MMP-13 elevation (24-48 h). IL-1β was associated with sustained signaling activation and pronounced transitions between ferroptosis-related and apoptotic-related markers. In contrast, TNF-α induced rapid but transient early-phase responses, whereas LPS exhibited a delayed yet persistent low-grade inflammatory profile. The selection of inflammatory inducers should be aligned with specific experimental objectives. IL-1β is suitable for modeling sustained catabolic activity and cell death transitions, TNF-α for early-stage inflammatory responses, and LPS for chronic low-grade inflammation. This kinetic-based framework may improve model selection and enhance the translational relevance of in vitro OA studies, although further experimental validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545534What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.