ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Disruption of small RNAs and mechanistic variation in Segregation Distorter: A sperm-killing drive system in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pervasive suppressors halt the spread of selfish Segregation Distorter in a natural population.Genetics · 2026Article
- Disruption of small RNAs and mechanistic variation in Segregation Distorter: A sperm-killing drive system in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Targeted editing of pericentromeric satellite DNA alters sensitivity to meiotic drive.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meiotic drivers achieve biased transmission to the next generation, often at the expense of their host. Drive is widespread and can shape the evolution of proteins, chromosome structure, and karyotypes. The sperm killer Segregation Distorter (SD) in Drosophila melanogaster is a well-studied driver but like most complex drivers, its mechanism remains elusive. SD is a multigene complex frequently associated with chromosomal inversions where the main driver locus, a truncated duplication of the gene RanGAP, kills wild-type sperm containing a satellite DNA called Responder (Rsp). Small RNAs are frequently implicated in the mechanisms of sperm killers, and we recently showed that Rsp is a source of small RNAs. Here we study the transcriptomes of two SD haplotypes and our results link Rsp expression and/or RNAs to drive. We found that Rsp-derived small RNAs are underrepresented in driving testes of only one of the SD haplotypes. We show that over-expressing Rsp is sufficient to reduce drive strength in the haplotype with downregulated Rsp but not the other. We therefore shed light on the mechanism of SD by making a connection between the target and the drive phenotype. Additionally, our data imply that different haplotypes of complex drivers, like SD, can vary in their mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.