ReviewPediatric research2026
Microglial maturation across human and mouse as a reference for interpreting large-animal models of perinatal brain injury.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microglia play dynamic roles in the developing brain and are central mediators of injury responses in perinatal brain injury. In mice, microglial gene regulatory and transcriptional programes reveal progression through early, pre-mature and mature stages. In contrast, microglial maturation has not been systematically characterised in the large-brained species most widely used to model human perinatal brain injury, particularly sheep and pigs. These large-animal models are indispensable as they share gyrencephaly, an expanded subplate, and clinically relevant physiology with the human infant brain. Here, we integrate established mouse and human frameworks of microglial maturation with a critical re-analysis of available sheep and pig datasets to assess whether rodent-derived insights into microglial development extend to large-animal models. Current sheep datasets lack sufficient resolution to infer maturation states, whereas pig data, although limited, reveal stage-dependent patterns consistent with late-gestation human development. This review also briefly considers emerging data on microglial development in non-human primates and the extent to which microglial gene expression programes appear conserved across species. Overall, microglial transitions are most dynamic during fetal and early postnatal life, underscoring the importance of developmentally aligned benchmarks for interpreting injury responses and informing microglia-targeted neuroprotective strategies. IMPACT: This article provides the first structured comparison of microglial maturation across human and mouse and uses these frameworks to benchmark large-brain animal models of perinatal brain injury, addressing a key translational gap. It shows that while existing sheep datasets lack sufficient resolution to define microglial maturation states, available pig data align closely with human late-gestation microglial development, supporting their use for developmental benchmarking. The work highlights that failure to account for microglial developmental stage risks misinterpretation of injury responses and underscores the need for developmentally aligned microglial markers in large-animal and non-human primate models to guide microglia-targeted neuroprotective strategies.
Identifiers
42547841What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.