ReviewTranslational neurodegeneration2026
Brain insulin resistance as a driver of proteinopathy in neurodegeneration: from cell-type-specific mechanisms to targeted therapeutics.
Review in Translational neurodegeneration, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are increasingly linked to systemic metabolic dysfunction, with brain insulin resistance (BIR) positioned as a central mediator. Yet translating this insight into effective therapies has proven remarkably difficult. This review argues that BIR-driven neurodegeneration should be interpreted at two distinct but interconnected levels: cell-type-specific disruption of brain homeostasis by BIR, and the direct, mechanistic role of BIR in driving the proteinopathies that define Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. We first show how BIR produces distinct functional deficits across neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes, impairing synaptic plasticity, metabolic coupling, immunometabolic homeostasis, and myelination, resulting in a cellular milieu that favors proteinopathy. We then map molecular pathways through which BIR directly distrubs the metabolism of amyloid-β, tau, and α-synuclein. We further examine how islet amyloid polypeptide cross-seeds cerebral amyloid pathology, suggesting a direct molecular interaction between the peripheral drivers of BIR and protein aggregation. In this framework, BIR functions not as a passive risk factor, but as an active, upstream driver of proteostatic collapse. Cellular dysfunction combined with proteostatic failure, defines the therapeutic target space. We evaluate interventions accordingly, distinguishing those that primarily restore cellular function from those that enhance protein clearance, and those that achieve both. For each strategy, we assess the translational evidence, critically appraising the barriers that have limited their clinical success, including patient heterogeneity, narrow therapeutic windows, and inadequate central nervous system delivery. By integrating cell-type-specific biology with proteostatic mechanisms and a clinically oriented therapeutic framework, this review aims to provide a foundation for multi-target strategies that address the BIR-neurodegeneration axis at its mechanistic roots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.