ReviewXenotransplantation
Global Consultation for Clinical Xenotransplantation: International Xenotransplantation Association Consensus and Communiqué Update.
Review in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xenotransplantation has entered a phase of accelerated clinical translation, necessitating renewed international consensus on governance, ethics, safety, and regulatory oversight. In September 2025, the International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA), in partnership with The Transplantation Society (TTS) and with engagement from the World Health Organization (WHO), convened a Global Consultation in Geneva to review, update, and harmonise international guidance for clinical xenotransplantation. This IXA consultation marked the twentieth anniversary of the first WHO Xenotransplantation Advisory Consultation in 2005 and built upon the foundational principles established through the Changsha Communiqué (2008, 2011 and 2018) and subsequent IXA and WHO-led initiatives. Responding to rapid scientific advances, including some defined donor genetic standards, improved immunosuppression, enhanced biosecurity, and strengthened infectious disease surveillance, the IXA undertook an 18‑month, structured, evidence‑based revision process. Seven expert working groups, comprising approximately forty internationally recognised specialists from fourteen countries, reviewed developments across source animal standards and biosecurity, clinical trial design and oversight, immunosuppression and patient management, infectious disease risk and surveillance, ethical and legal frameworks, international governance, and emerging technologies. Draft recommendations were further refined through iterative consultation and plenary deliberation at the in‑person meeting held in Geneva, September 2025. The consultation proposed updated Principles and Recommendations directed to WHO, national regulators, investigators and sponsors, and the IXA/TTS communities. Key elements include proportionate risk benefit assessments, robust donor and recipient surveillance, long‑term biobanking and monitoring, transparency and public engagement, harmonised regulatory oversight consistent with existing allotransplantation frameworks, and equitable access to future clinical applications. The revised guidance aligns with contemporary regulatory expectations of major international jurisdictions regulatory authorities including (AEMPS, ANMAT, CONABIA, CONFEPRIS, EMA, FDA, GTAC, HC, IEC, INCUCAI, Medsafe, MFDS, MHRA, MHLW, NMPA, NZGTAC, MFDS, MHRA, TGA); and consolidates international consensus at a critical juncture for the field. This IXA Global Consultation provides an authoritative, forward‑looking framework to support safe, ethical, and globally coordinated clinical xenotransplantation as it transitions from experimental innovation to regulated clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.