ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2026
Hypnosis and relaxation techniques in the management of temporomandibular disorders: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common causes of orofacial pain, influenced by psychological and behavioural factors. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as hypnosis and relaxation techniques, have been proposed to modulate pain perception, reduce muscle hyperactivity, and improve coping. However, their role in TMD management remains unclear. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize the available evidence on the use of hypnosis and relaxation interventions in adolescents and adults with TMD. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases from January 1992 to January 2026 identified a limited number of eligible studies (n = 10), comprising randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies, with substantial methodological heterogeneity in study design. Methodological quality was appraised using a simplified Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Interventions included medical hypnosis, hypnosis combined with cognitive-behavioural therapy, and various relaxation techniques, delivered as stand-alone or adjunctive therapies. Findings for the 661 participants were inconsistent: hypnosis-based interventions suggested potential reductions in pain intensity and psychological distress, whereas relaxation techniques showed mixed results, particularly when compared to standard treatments such as occlusal splints. Methodological appraisal revealed variability in study quality, with three studies at low risk of bias, four at moderate risk, and three at high risk. Overall, the small number of studies and their marked heterogeneity substantially limit the interpretability and comparability of findings, thereby constraining their integration into a robust evidence-based biopsychosocial model for TMD management. Consequently, current evidence remains preliminary and insufficient to support firm clinical recommendations. Nevertheless, these approaches are conceptually aligned with the biopsychosocial model of TMD, and preliminary results suggest that hypnosis and relaxation may represent low-risk adjunctive strategies within multimodal TMD management, particularly for patients with stress-sensitive or centrally sensitized pain profiles. Future well-designed, adequately powered trials with standardized interventions and multidimensional outcomes are needed to clarify their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.