Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548332›Full record

ArticleCHEST pulmonary2025

Relationship Between the Levels of Feno, Blood Eosinophils, and the Severity of Exacerbations in Patients With COPD: Results From COSYCONET.

Peter Alter, Henrik Watz, Kathrin Kahnert, Franziska C Trudzinski, Hubert Wirtz, Tim Speicher, Inge Kokot, Sandra Söhler, Robert Bals, Klaus F Rabe and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01245933 (Impact of Systemic Manifestations/Comorbidities on Clinical State, Prognosis and Utilisation of Health Care Resources in Patients With COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01245933 completednot on this map

Impact of Systemic Manifestations/Comorbidities on Clinical State, Prognosis and Utilisation of Health Care Resources in Patients With COPD

TypeobservationalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2010 to 2023Enrolled2,741ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peter AlterDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Henrik WatzVelocity Clinical Research Germany GmbH, Ahrensburg, Germany.
Kathrin KahnertDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
Franziska C TrudzinskiDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hubert WirtzDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Pneumology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tim SpeicherDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Inge KokotDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Sandra SöhlerDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Robert BalsDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pulmonology, Allergology, Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Klaus F RabeLungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Department of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Emiel F M WoutersDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Claus F VogelmeierDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Rudolf A JörresInstitute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Exacerbation risk of patients with COPD is thought to be influenced by type 2 inflammation, with blood eosinophil counts and fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) as potential biomarkers. Research Question: Are there different associations of blood eosinophils and Feno with exacerbation risk and severity in COPD, indicating a different role of local inflammation vs systemic factors? Study Design and Methods: Data were taken from 3 visits (1.5 years apart) of the longitudinal COPD and Systemic Consequences-Comorbidities Network (COSYCONET) cohort, comprising a broad range of clinical and functional assessments. We determined the relationships between eosinophil counts and Feno vs exacerbations, defined either via categorization to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease group E (≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe), or as ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the year before each visit. Analyses were performed via generalized linear models. Results: The final data set included 384, 255, and 206 patients at visits 6, 7, and 8, respectively. According to the multivariable analyses, exacerbation risk defined via Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease group E was associated with elevated values (≥ 25 ppb) of Feno ( Interpretation: Our observations suggest a differential role of type 2-related biomarkers Feno and eosinophils for exacerbation risk and severity. Feno seemed superior regarding a broad range of exacerbations predominantly involving local airway events, whereas systemic eosinophils played a larger role in severe exacerbations. The findings also suggest that a low eosinophil count might indicate a low risk of severe exacerbations, whereas highly elevated counts did not play a statistical role. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01245933; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

COPDeosinophilsexacerbationexhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)

Identifiers

PMID42548332
PMCPMC13417804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.