ReviewFrontiers in stroke2026
Autophagy in ischemic stroke: pathophysiology, therapeutics, and challenges ahead.
Review in Frontiers in stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autophagy is a fundamental cellular homeostatic process that exerts a dual, context-dependent influence on the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke. Functioning as both a neuroprotective survival mechanism and a neurotoxic pathway, autophagy presents a complex therapeutic challenge as well as a potential target for molecular intervention. This narrative review synthesizes preclinical and emerging clinical evidence to summarize key mechanisms regulating autophagy in ischemic injury, evaluate therapeutic strategies, and identify promising molecular pathways and druggable targets for translational development. In the early ischemic phase, moderate autophagic activation facilitates neuronal survival by clearing damaged mitochondria and protein aggregates, thereby reducing oxidative stress and modulating neuroinflammation. This protective response is primarily mediated by regulators such as Beclin-1, the conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II, and the energy-sensing AMP-activated protein kinase pathway. Conversely, sustained or excessive autophagy, particularly during late-stage reperfusion, exacerbates neuronal injury through impaired lysosomal fusion, autophagosome accumulation, and the triggering of autophagic cell death and ferroptosis. Preclinical evidence highlights a critical Goldilocks zone of activation, suggesting that therapeutic success hinges on maintaining autophagic flux within narrow physiological limits. Advancing these therapies into clinical practice requires precise spatiotemporal modulation, potentially as an adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy, as well as the development of robust, real-time biomarkers. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular and genetic determinants of autophagy, including sex-specific responses, is essential to bridge the translational gap and establish autophagy as a viable target for precision stroke medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.