ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Low energy availability, the gut microbiome, and bone health in athletes: a mechanistic narrative review based on athlete evidence and clinical analogues.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low energy availability (LEA) is a central aetiological factor in Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) and is frequently associated with impaired skeletal health in athletic populations, although skeletal responses can be heterogeneous. However, athletes with apparently similar energetic and training exposures can differ in bone mineral density, bone turnover and bone stress injury risk, indicating that additional physiological mediators may modify the skeletal response to under-fuelling. The gut microbiome has emerged as a plausible candidate because microbial metabolites, intestinal barrier integrity, immune signalling and endocrine pathways can influence bone remodelling. Direct studies integrating energy availability, gut microbiome profiling and bone outcomes in athletes are currently lacking. This narrative review therefore synthesises athlete evidence for the LEA-bone relationship and uses clinical and preclinical analogues of chronic energy deficiency to develop a testable gut-bone framework for sport. The accumulated evidence from athletes primarily supports the direct LEA-bone relationship, whereas the candidate gut-bone microbiome component remains a biologically plausible hypothesis based on clinical and preclinical models. Specifically, evidence from athletes supports LEA and REDs risk as contributors to lower bone mineral density, altered bone microarchitecture, suppressed bone formation markers and bone stress injury risk, although findings vary by sex, sport type, skeletal loading, assessment method and timing. Evidence from anorexia nervosa and other undernutrition models suggests that energy deficiency can be accompanied by altered microbial diversity, depletion of short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa, lower short-chain fatty acid availability, impaired barrier function and low-grade inflammation. Mechanistically, short-chain fatty acids, endotoxin-mediated inflammation, insulin-osteocalcin signalling, bile acid pathways and amino acid metabolites may intersect with canonical REDs endocrine disturbances to influence bone remodelling. The available evidence does not establish a causal gut-mediated pathway in athletes, but it supports a biologically plausible model that should be tested in prospective athlete cohorts using integrated assessments of energy availability, diet, training load, microbiome composition and function, endocrine status, bone turnover and bone structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.