Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Effects of inspiratory muscle Pre-activation on 100 m sprint performance in physically active university students.

Javier Carrión, Stalin Javier Caiza Lema, Samira Anahí Masaquiza Sanguil, Maria Augusta Latta Sánchez, Andrea Carolina Peñafiel Luna, Paúl Adrián Arias Córdova, Angela Priscila Campos Moposita, Josselyn Gabriela Bonilla Ayala, Martha Montalvan, Raynier Zambrano-Villacrés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Javier Carrión *Department of Chemistry, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador.
Stalin Javier Caiza Lema *Carrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Samira Anahí Masaquiza SanguilCarrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Maria Augusta Latta SánchezCarrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Andrea Carolina Peñafiel LunaCarrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Paúl Adrián Arias CórdovaCarrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Angela Priscila Campos MopositaCarrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Josselyn Gabriela Bonilla AyalaCarrera de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador.
Martha MontalvanEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.
Raynier Zambrano-VillacrésFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud y Desarrollo Humano, Universidad ECOTEC, Samborondón, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Inspiratory muscle function may influence high-intensity exercise through mechanical stabilization and fatigue-related mechanisms. Inspiratory muscle pre-activation has been proposed as an ergogenic strategy; however, its effectiveness in short-duration sprint performance remains unclear. This study examined the acute effects of inspiratory muscle pre-activation on 100 m sprint performance in physically active university students. Methodology: A within-subject, quasi-experimental design was employed with 25 participants performing two warm-up conditions: peripheral muscle activation (PMA) and PMA plus inspiratory muscle activation (IMA). The inspiratory protocol consisted of two sets of 15 breaths at 40% of maximal inspiratory pressure. Sprint performance was assessed using a 100 m maximal effort, and differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( Results: Mean sprint times were 12.92 ± 2.12 s for PMA and 12.96 ± 2.10 s for IMA. Although a statistically significant difference was observed ( Discussion: The findings indicate that inspiratory muscle pre-activation did not produce a practically meaningful performance benefit in short-duration sprinting. The limited role of respiratory factors in the 100 m sprint and the dominance of neuromuscular determinants likely explain the absence of performance enhancement. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle pre-activation did not produce a practically meaningful improvement in 100 m sprint performance in physically active individuals. It may be included within a broader warm-up routine, but the present data do not support its use as a primary strategy to improve 100 m sprint performance.

Indexed as

anaerobic performanceinspiratory muscle pre-activationphysically active university studentsrespiratorysprint

Identifiers

PMID42548710
PMCPMC13429728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.