ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Fecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis: mucosal immune mechanisms and precision microbiota therapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as an investigational microbiota-targeted strategy for ulcerative colitis (UC), aiming to restore dysbiotic gut ecosystems and microbiota-host homeostasis. Mechanistic studies suggest that FMT may reshape microbial community structure, enrich short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria, remodel bile acid and tryptophan-aryl hydrocarbon signaling, enhance epithelial barrier integrity, and regulate mucosal immunity, including Th17/Treg balance, IgA-associated responses, macrophage reprogramming, IL-10/IL-22 signaling, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Randomized controlled trials indicate that FMT can induce clinical and endoscopic remission in selected patients with UC, particularly when administered through the lower gastrointestinal route and using multi-donor or optimized regimens. Current guidelines do not recommend conventional FMT as routine therapy for UC outside clinical trials, reflecting the heterogeneity and low certainty of available evidence. However, its efficacy appears limited in moderate-to-severe or biologic-refractory disease, underscoring the importance of host inflammatory burden and recipient ecological receptivity. Personalized strategies, including donor-recipient functional matching, dietary modulation, combination therapy, and next-generation microbiota therapeutics, may improve response and safety but require prospective validation. This review integrates microbiota-metabolite-barrier-immune mechanisms with clinical evidence to define where FMT may be useful, where its benefit appears limited, and how future studies can move the field toward precision microbiota therapy in UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.