ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Foundation model-enhanced multimodal radiomics for predicting response to chemo-immunotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a foundation model-driven multimodal fusion framework for non-invasive prediction of treatment response to first-line chemo-immunotherapy in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Methods: In this retrospective study, baseline contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) images and clinical data from patients with advanced LUSC receiving first-line chemo-immunotherapy were collected. Handcrafted radiomics features were extracted from tumor regions of interest, and 2.5D deep learning features were extracted using a DINO-pretrained vision Transformer foundation model. Clinical variables were incorporated to construct a multi-source features fusion model based on machine learning classifiers. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. DeLong testing, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were performed for comparative assessment. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to enhance model interpretability and decision transparency. Results: Among the constructed models, the multi-source features fusion model (FusionModel) achieved the best predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.903 and an accuracy of 0.885 in the training cohort, and an AUC of 0.863 and an accuracy of 0.836 in the validation cohort. FusionModel outperformed models based on single-modality features and demonstrated superior net clinical benefit on DCA. NRI and IDI analyses further supported improved reclassification ability. SHAP analysis revealed that deep learning features contributed dominantly, while radiomics and clinical variables provided complementary prognostic information, supporting the biological plausibility of the model. Conclusion: The foundation model-driven multi-source features fusion model enabled accurate and interpretable prediction of chemo-immunotherapy response in advanced LUSC. This strategy demonstrated strong discriminative performance and clinical applicability, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive tool for individualized treatment stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.