Evidence mapPaperPMID 42548874Full record

ReviewIranian journal of public health2025

Exploring the Role of and Factors Affecting Public-Private Partnership in Health Care Systems: A Scoping Review.

Motahhareh Yekehbash, Reyhaneh Zarei, Hassan Joulaei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Motahhareh YekehbashHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Reyhaneh ZareiHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hassan JoulaeiHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public-private partnerships (PPPs) address issues of access, quality, and innovation in health care. This paper assesses the impact of various PPP models on health care delivery and explores factors influencing their success. We aimed to deepen policymakers' and practitioners' understanding of PPP dynamics, challenges, and opportunities. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using a systematic approach to identify relevant literature on PPPs in health care from 2000 to 2024. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using specific search terms and inclusion criteria. Data from selected articles were analyzed to identify key themes, drivers, and outcomes related to PPP implementation and impact. Results: The review covered 37 PPP studies from multiple countries, revealing mixed results and challenges. Successful PPPs in China, Iran, and Kenya improved health care delivery, efficiency, and patient satisfaction. However, challenges such as regulatory barriers, financial constraints, and integration issues persist. In Spain and Portugal, PPPs often face public rejection due to perceived financial unsustainability. Legal and regulatory frameworks in Iran and Tanzania hinder effective PPP implementation. Conclusion: PPPs have significant potential to transform health systems, especially in resource-limited settings. Their success relies on careful planning, strong governance, and adapting to local contexts. For PPPs to be effective, they must prioritize equity and sustainability in their design and execution.

Indexed as

Healthcare servicesPartnership modelsPublic-private partnershipsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42548874
PMCPMC13429961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.