ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive inflexibility, a reduced capacity to shift mental set or update behavior when circumstances change, is a significant feature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, while cognitive inflexibility is superficially a coherent entity, it appears to engage a range of distinct cognitive processes. This raises the question of how far deficits in different tasks involve the same core dysfunction and how far the dysfunctions are unique but superficially have similar results. Here we detail the neural basis of OCD deficits across eight tasks that challenge different aspects of cognitive flexibility: set-shifting (Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, Intra/Extra-Dimensional Set Shift), feedback adaptation (Reversal Learning), interference control (Stroop Color and Word Test), response inhibition (Go/No-Go Task and Stop Signal Task), working memory updating (n-back Task), and value-based flexibility (Delay Discounting Task). Cognitive inflexibility in OCD appears linked to functional abnormalities in a largely shared set of core structures (anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, orbital frontal cortex, and prefrontal cortex) and less shared 'peripheral' structures (putamen, thalamus, parietal cortex), based on cross-task convergence of OCD-specific abnormalities. Even the shared core appears to engage multiple interconnected neural networks. The cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical network appears central, and the salience network and the default mode network also contribute with indirect, task-varying effects on peripheral parts of each. Peripheral areas are less consistently involved but appear to contribute to OCD nonetheless. Cognitive inflexibility in OCD appears to involve failure of interaction between multiple networks rather than dysfunction in any single system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.