Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548909›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2026

PTEN Loss in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Integrative Molecular and Clinicopathological Insights.

Sandeep Kumar, Tamanna Thakur, Anjali Chadda, Santhosh Irrinki, Siddhant Khare, Amanjit Bal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandeep KumarDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, pgimer.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-6065
Tamanna ThakurDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, pgimer.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4859-6639
Anjali ChaddaDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, pgimer.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4287-7894
Santhosh IrrinkiDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, pgimer.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4624-5583
Siddhant KhareDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, pgimer.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9142-1115
Amanjit BalDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, pgimer.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-8589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a key tumor suppressor gene that negatively regulates the PI3K/AKT pathway. PTEN deficiency is the most frequent molecular alteration in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, the relationship between PTEN protein loss and underlying genomic alterations remains incompletely understood. Methods: Fifty TNBC cases were evaluated for PTEN protein expression by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. PTEN hotspot mutations (Exons 1, 5, 7, and 9) were analyzed using Sanger sequencing, whereas copy number alterations were assessed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. PTEN alterations were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics. External validation of PTEN mRNA and protein expression and prognostic significance was performed using publicly available TCGA/CPTAC datasets and Kaplan-Meier plotter. Results: PTEN protein loss was observed in 41/50 TNBC cases (82%), indicating that PTEN deficiency is a frequent event in this subtype. PTEN mutations were detected in six cases (12%) and were confined exclusively to Exon 5, comprising one missense mutation (c.277C>A) and two truncating mutations (c.430del and c.433del). MLPA identified PTEN copy number alterations in four cases (8%), including heterozygous deletions and duplications. No significant association was observed between PTEN protein expression and genomic alterations, highlighting a substantial genotype-phenotype discordance. Analysis of independent public datasets confirmed significantly reduced PTEN mRNA and protein expression in TNBC compared with luminal and HER2-positive breast cancers. Patients with low PTEN expression showed a trend toward shorter overall survival (23.5 vs. 38.9 months), though the difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: PTEN protein loss is highly prevalent in TNBC but is only partially explained by mutations and copy number alterations, suggesting that additional regulatory mechanisms, such as epigenetic or posttranscriptional events, contribute to PTEN inactivation. These findings underscore the biological importance of PTEN deficiency in TNBC and support further investigation of PTEN as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.

Indexed as

mutationsprotein expressionPTENTNBC

Identifiers

PMID42548909
PMCPMC13430043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.