ArticleCureus2026
Marked Asymptomatic Creatine Kinase Elevation With Preserved Renal Function Identified Through Protocol-Driven Monitoring in a Clinical Trial Participant: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels may occur in a wide range of clinical conditions including skeletal muscle injury, inflammatory myopathies, medication-associated myotoxicity, rhabdomyolysis, and strenuous physical activity. Distinguishing clinically significant muscle injury from transient physiologic hyperCKemia may be particularly challenging in asymptomatic patients undergoing routine laboratory surveillance. We report the case of a 62-year-old African American male clinical trial participant in whom marked asymptomatic hyperCKemia was identified through protocol-driven safety monitoring during long-term study participation. Serial laboratory assessments identified a marked isolated serum CK elevation (2694 U/L) with preserved creatinine clearance and stable renal function throughout the monitoring period. Approximately three weeks prior to the peak laboratory abnormality, the participant reported intensification of physical exercise activity. Despite marked CK elevation, the participant denied myalgia, muscle weakness, dark urine, decreased urine output, chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, or constitutional symptoms. Twelve-lead electrocardiography demonstrated normal sinus rhythm with nonspecific low-amplitude T-wave abnormalities without clinically significant arrhythmias or acute ischemic abnormalities. Review of temporal relationships, concomitant medications, available safety data, and the Investigator's Brochure did not support the investigational product as a likely contributor to the laboratory abnormalities. The participant remained clinically stable with preserved renal function and spontaneous improvement in laboratory abnormalities during continued monitoring. This case highlights the importance of contextual interpretation of marked asymptomatic CK elevation and demonstrates how protocol-driven safety monitoring can facilitate early identification and evaluation of clinically silent laboratory abnormalities in clinical trial participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.