ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
A machine learning-based prediction model for delirium risk in malnourished elderly ICU patients with SHAP interpretability.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify risk factors associated with in-hospital delirium among malnourished elderly patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to develop and validate a machine learning-based prediction model for early risk stratification. Methods: Using data from a large single-center ICU database (MIMIC-IV) and a multicenter ICU database (eICU-CRD), elderly patients with malnutrition who met predefined inclusion criteria were enrolled. Multiple machine learning models were developed and systematically compared. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, precision-recall curves, and additional performance metrics. External validation was conducted in an independent cohort to evaluate model generalizability. The final model was further interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and a corresponding prediction tool was constructed. Results: In total, 6,449 malnourished elderly ICU patients were included. Patients who developed delirium showed significantly higher disease severity, greater physiological instability, and worse clinical outcomes than those without delirium. Among the evaluated models, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the best overall performance in terms of discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefit, and demonstrated stable predictive ability in the external validation cohort. The final model included seven predictors: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, body temperature, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO Conclusion: This study developed and externally validated a machine learning-based prediction model for delirium risk in malnourished elderly ICU patients, with good predictive performance and interpretability. The model may aid in early identification of high-risk individuals and support targeted prevention and individualized management of delirium in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.