ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
Evaluation of a medical-rehabilitation integration model to improve rehabilitation service efficiency in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the association of the medical‒rehabilitation services in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital through the implementation of a medical-rehabilitation integration model. Methods: Nantong Rehabilitation Hospital was used as a representative case. The effects of implementing the medical-rehabilitation integration model on medical service delivery models, medical resource utilization, and the operational efficiency of major disease categories were evaluated using comparative data analysis and other analytical approaches. Results: Following implementation of the medical-rehabilitation integration model, which encompassed acute-phase management, early rehabilitation intervention, the rehabilitation phase, and long-term management, continuity across all stages of diagnosis and treatment was achieved. This integrated approach addressed patients' comprehensive and individualized needs related to diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. Indicators of medical resource utilization and the operational efficiency of major disease categories showed significant improvement after implementation. Conclusions: The medical-rehabilitation integration model was associated with enhanced medical resource utilization, optimized the operational efficiency of disease categories, and improved patient satisfaction through multidisciplinary collaboration, early rehabilitation intervention, information support, and process optimization. Strengthening the three-tier rehabilitation service chain, reinforcing the integrated development of clinical practice, education, and research, and ensuring sustained policy and resource support are necessary to promote the long-term development of the medical-rehabilitation integration model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.