ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Cultural participation rights as a proposed pathway for internal migrant mental health: an institutional analysis from China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mental health risks of internal migrants have become increasingly prominent, yet traditional diagnosis and treatment pathways face structural barriers including the uneven distribution of medical resources, insufficient service accessibility, high time costs, and the stigma surrounding mental health that prevent them from adequately addressing the mental health problems of this population. Cultural participation, as a low-threshold, low-stigma daily practice, may provide preventive support before mental health conditions deteriorate through fostering social connection and cultivating a sense of belonging and identity. Although public cultural services are not designed exclusively for internal migrants, their universally accessible and daily-embedded institutional characteristics may offer this population an alternative pathway for mental health support that complements the barriers to formal help-seeking. The Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law of the People's Republic of China, as the foundational legislation in this field, establishes a normative framework centered on guaranteeing basic cultural rights and interests, enriching spiritual and cultural life, and advocating healthy and civilized activities. Thus it provides normative space for public cultural services to undertake health promotion functions. In practice, however, resource allocation and performance assessment remain heavily oriented toward physical indicators such as the number of venues, facility size, and event frequency, with insufficient attention paid to whether service content matches users' actual needs, whether access arrangements accommodate diverse groups, and whether participation processes are conducive to social interaction and emotional regulation. Under this logic, internal migrants are mostly regarded as service recipients rather than subjects of cultural participation, constraining the release of the mental health support potential that public cultural services inherently possess. Accordingly, the cultural participation opportunities, expression rights, and identity recognition needs of internal migrants should be incorporated into the framework of legal protection, and public cultural services should be transformed from general cultural supply into institutionalized public resources oriented toward mental health prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.