Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549246›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Revisiting bone healing strategies: the potential of reverse dynamization in veterinary orthopedics.

Anas Datoussaid, Marc Balligand, Pierre P Picavet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anas DatoussaidDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Marc BalligandDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre P PicavetDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse dynamization is an emerging orthopedic strategy that modulates fixation stiffness throughout fracture healing to better align the mechanical environment with the evolving biological requirements of tissue repair. In contrast to traditional dynamization, which typically begins with rigid fixation followed by progressive destabilization, reverse dynamization permits controlled early interfragmentary motion before increasing construct stiffness during later stages of healing. This review examines the biological and biomechanical foundations of reverse dynamization and evaluates its potential relevance for companion animal orthopedic surgery. Current preclinical evidence from rodent, ovine, and caprine models suggests that reverse dynamization can accelerate callus formation, improve tissue organization, enhance vascularization, and increase the mechanical competence of healing bone compared with static or conventionally dynamized fixation strategies. These findings support the concept that staged modulation of fixation stiffness may better reflect the changing mechanobiological requirements of fracture repair. Particular attention is given to veterinary-specific considerations, including quadrupedal locomotion, variable postoperative loading, reliance on secondary bone healing, and the potential applicability of adaptive fixation systems such as external fixators and dynamic implant constructs. However, the available evidence remains largely restricted to controlled experimental models and is limited by small sample sizes, sparse independent replication, and the absence of clinical studies in veterinary patients. Reverse dynamization should therefore be regarded as a promising mechanobiological concept rather than an established clinical strategy in veterinary orthopedics. Further veterinary-specific investigations are required to define optimal mechanical parameters, evaluate clinical feasibility, and determine whether the benefits observed in experimental models translate to routine fracture management in companion animals.

Indexed as

bone regenerationcompanion animalsfracture healingreverse dynamizationveterinary orthopedics

Identifiers

PMID42549246
PMCPMC13430721

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.