Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549346›Full record

ArticleDiscovery immunology2026

Fixation matters: duration in fixative prior to immunofluorescent analysis directly impacts macrophage visualization in epithelial tissues.

Lizi M Hegarty, Erin Watson, Calum C Bain, Elaine Emmerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discovery immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lizi M HegartyCentre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Erin WatsonCentre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Calum C BainSchool of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Elaine EmmersonCentre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-3368

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Macrophages are now recognized as key players in a range of tissues and biological processes, responding to injury and infection, and facilitating development and regeneration. As the importance of macrophage crosstalk within these processes has been revealed, so too has the significance of studying the spatial positioning of macrophages within the tissue of interest. As such, immunofluorescent microscopy-based analysis is becoming an increasingly attractive technique for immunology research. While tissue fixation preserves the tissue architecture and immobilizes target antigens, prolonged fixation can negatively impact protein recognition. Methods: We compared three different durations of tissue fixation and the expression of key macrophage and structural cell markers in the submandibular gland, pancreas, kidney, and skin by immunofluorescent imaging. Results: We report that prolonged exposure to a paraformaldehyde-based fixative profoundly impacts detection of cell surface markers that define macrophage subsets in the mouse submandibular gland, in contrast to epithelial cell markers, which appear more robust. We find that this is not exclusive to the salivary gland, and similar effects are seen in the pancreas and kidney. Importantly, a short duration of fixation allowed the detection of macrophage subsets in both mouse and human tissue without compromising the detection of other markers. Conclusion: Adoption of a short fixation approach enables accurate detection of a wide range of cell types in tissues, and facilitates exploration of spatial positioning and cell proximity by immunofluorescent microscopy analysis.

Indexed as

epitheliafixationimmunofluorescencemacrophagesmicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42549346
PMCPMC13433114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.