ArticlePeerJ2026
Effects of diarrhea and antibiotic-induced microbial elimination on dynamic changes in fecal microbial communities and antibiotic resistance of Hu sheep lambs (
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a highly reproductive meat sheep breed in China, Hu sheep is an important economic group in ruminant animal breeding. However, research on its intestinal microbiomes under the background of diarrhea and antibiotic treatment remains relatively limited. Methods: This study investigated the intestinal microbiota of Hu sheep lambs in the preliminary stage of diarrhea (group DM), the late recovery stage of diarrhea (group DL), and the healthy stage (group H). Diseased individuals (groups DM and DL) were treated with a combination of Shuanghuanglian, Cefazolin, Lincomycin, and Dexamethasone (0.2 mL dosage). To characterize the intestinal microbiota, fecal samples were collected from all groups, and metagenomic sequencing was performed. Using metagenomic binning tools and co-assembly methods, we reconstructed 482 high-quality non-redundant metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs). Results: Among these MAGs, 70% belong to the phyla Bacillota, Bacteroidota, and Pseudomonadota, highly consistent with the typical structure of intestinal microbiota in ruminants. Functional annotation revealed that the genes encoding carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) are more abundant in Bacillota and Bacteroidota, which supports the degradation and energy metabolism functions of Hu sheep on fibrous feed. During the preliminary stage of diarrhea, the virulence genes carried by symbiotic bacteria such as Lachnospiraceae, Acutalibacteraceae and Bacteroidaceae were enriched. Although diarrhea symptoms alleviated during the late recovery stage of diarrhea, the combined use of multiple antibiotics led to the continuous enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) related to lincosamides and cephalosporins. The average abundance of cephalosporin-related ARGs in group DL was significantly higher than that in group DM and H, indicating a risk of residual ARGs. Microbial diversity analysis showed that there was no significant overall difference in MAGs between group DM and H, but both groups showed significant differences compared to group DL, suggesting that antibiotic driven clearance of sensitive bacteria is the core driving force. Moreover, our study shows that the abundance of the zoonotic pathogens Conclusions: This study not only expands the genomic database of ruminant intestinal microorganisms but also provides a key theoretical basis for formulating intestinal microecological regulation strategies and optimizing diarrhea treatment regimens for Hu sheep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.