ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Federating European REgistries for Stroke: Principles, Data Model and Future Perspectives for a Federated Analysis of Multiple Prospective Stroke Registries.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute ischemic stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Despite strong evidence supporting reperfusion therapies and Stroke Unit care, access and quality of stroke services remain heterogeneous across Europe. Although national stroke registries provide valuable real-world data, fragmentation, limited interoperability, and data protection constraints have restricted multinational analyses and benchmarking.
methodsThe Federating European REgistries for Stroke (FERES) initiative establishes a GDPR-compliant federated framework for secondary use of stroke registry data. FERES harmonizes heterogeneous datasets through a stroke-specific Common Data Elements (CDE) model and performs analyses locally within each registry using the Medical Informatics Platform, sharing only aggregated, non-identifiable outputs. To validate the framework, a predefined showcase analysis comparing anterior versus posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke was executed in both centralized and federated modes using an identical harmonized dataset.
resultsFERES connected five national registries from Austria, Greece, Ireland, Italy, and Switzerland within a unified federated infrastructure. At the time of analysis, 149,772 patient events from two registries were accessible for federated querying, with three additional registries technically integrated and in advanced onboarding. The harmonized ontology comprised 945 standardized variables spanning the stroke care pathway. Federated execution reproduced centralized pooled-data results across descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, effect sizes, and multivariable regression models with only minimal numerical discrepancies.
conclusionsFERES demonstrates that large-scale, multinational stroke research and benchmarking can be conducted in Europe using a privacy-preserving federated approach, providing a scalable foundation for cross-border real-world evidence generation and quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.