Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550052›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

"There Was a Light Bulb Moment": Using Persona Dyads to Empathise, Explore and Develop Person-Centred Solutions in Mental Health Service Co-Design.

A Dominello, S Lu, A De Los Santos, M Murphy, R Clay-Williams, C Cheek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A DominelloAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-5886
S LuAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2507-8443
A De Los SantosNSW Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7988-6214
M MurphyNSW Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8937-8418
R Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-7445
C CheekAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-1102

Funding

Commonwealth of Australia APP 2018361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCo-design of health services is an increasingly used method to meaningfully enable patient and public involvement, especially when working with priority populations whose perspectives are often overlooked in traditional top-down approaches. However, differences in power and influence among stakeholders can lead to asymmetry and the marginalisation of certain voices. We used persona dyads (patient and provider) to co-design improvements in Emergency Department care for people presenting with mental health concerns.

methodsPersona dyads were used in two Experience-Based Co-Design workshops with patients and providers. Transcripts were analysed to understand how personas were used, when and by whom. Participants completed surveys to evaluate the persona dyads and their co-design experience.

resultsPersona dyads humanised and contextualised Emergency Department experiences, fostering trust and safety by shifting attention from participants' personal histories to fictional representations without requiring personal disclosure. In the workshops, participants used the personas to establish shared understanding, enhance communication and generate creative, person-centred solutions responsive to both sides of the care relationship. We observed differences in persona use across the workshops; there was greater reliance on the personas as participants navigated more complex patient and professional dynamics. The persona dyads facilitated empathy through not only presenting the patient but also the provider, a perspective often under-represented in co-design.

conclusionPersonas can be a useful person-centred, participatory tool in health service co-design, with dyads being particularly useful for cultivating empathy, levelling power, amplifying lived experience and creating safe opportunities for priority populations to contribute meaningfully to service improvement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Individuals with lived experience of mental health concerns and Emergency Department healthcare providers were actively involved in the study. People with lived experience contributed to the co-design of the persona dyads and participated in the workshop sessions. One author, who has lived experience of mental illness, provided critical input into the design and facilitation of the workshops, with particular emphasis on creating psychologically safe spaces for participation. Two authors are Emergency Department healthcare providers and study co-investigators. The patient and provider contributors were involved in validating the findings, and ensuring interpretations were grounded in lived and professional experience.

Indexed as

EmpathyMental Health ServicesPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedProfessional-Patient Relationsemergency departmentsempathyequityexperience‐based co‐design (EBCD)participatory methodpatient and public involvementpriority populations

Identifiers

PMID42550052
PMCPMC13436128

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.