ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
The microbiome-mitochondria axis: the context-dependent role of urolithin A in aging and cancer via mitophagy.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithin A (UA) is a gut microbiota-derived metabolite formed from dietary ellagitannins and ellagic acid. It has drawn sustained interest because it can influence mitochondrial quality control, but the evidence does not support a simple anti-aging or anticancer label. In this review, UA is examined across microbial metabolism, urolithin metabotypes, pharmacokinetic exposure, mitophagy biology, aging-related phenotypes, and cancer. The emphasis is placed on what has been shown, what remains model-dependent, and where translational claims are still premature. Preclinical work links UA to PINK1/Parkin-, TFEB-, AMPK-, sirtuin-, and Nrf2-associated pathways, with reported improvements in mitochondrial turnover and inflammatory signaling. Human data are narrower: most trials have been short and have focused on safety, muscle performance, mitochondrial signatures, and circulating biomarkers. Evidence for cancer prevention or cancer therapy still comes mainly from cell and animal studies. Because mitophagy can limit early mitochondrial damage but may also help established tumors survive hypoxia, nutrient restriction, dormancy, and therapy-induced stress, UA is better regarded as a microbiome-dependent mitochondrial modulator whose effects depend on biological setting. The next step is to define direct molecular targets, test native and conjugated UA at human-relevant exposure ranges, account for UM-A, UM-B, and UM-0 metabotypes, and evaluate cancer-specific endpoints before making therapeutic claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550351What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.