ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
The 3D Biomechanics of Secondary Non-contact ACL Injuries in Two Female Adolescents: A Case Series of an Ipsilateral ACL Re-Rupture and a Contralateral ACL Rupture.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are significant knee injuries. Many studies have analysed video footage of the mechanisms of injury; however, the three-dimensional biomechanics of ACL ruptures have not previously been captured and presented. This case series reports on two secondary non-contact ACL ruptures in adolescent females: one ipsilateral ACL re-rupture and one contralateral ACL rupture. The injuries occurred during unplanned 90° cuts, which were completed as part of the clinic's standard of care return-to-play testing. Spatiotemporal parameters, joint and segment kinematics, ground reaction forces and joint moments and forces are presented during the approach, at the penultimate step and initial contact, and during the stance phase of the cutting step. These biomechanics are compared to planned 90° cuts and a pre-injury unplanned 90° cut. While there were slight differences in the exact injury mechanisms, common factors appeared to have contributed to the ACL ruptures. These potential mechanisms of injury included a fast approach speed without sufficient deceleration at the penultimate step; a larger touchdown distance; and a more outstretched leg in the anterior or lateral direction which, when combined with the rotation of the body towards the direction of the cut, may have limited knee flexion which likely contributed to large forces and moments acting at the knee. This case series highlights the need to develop training strategies aimed at reducing risky movement behaviours to reduce the risk of subsequent non-contact ACL injuries.
Identifiers
42550358What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.