ReviewDiscover nano2026
Landscape and evolutionary trends of nanotechnology in cancer radiosensitization.
Review in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the most basic clinical tumor treatment methods, yet its efficacy is often limited by radioresistance and off-target toxicity. Nanoradiosensitizers have emerged as a promising strategy for enhancing local dose deposition and regulating tumor microenvironment (TME). Despite the rapid development of the nanoradiosensitizer field, a comprehensive roadmap describing its evolution remains lacking. We analyzed 1,866 publications on nanoradiosensitizers in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database up to 2024. The global landscape is drawn using advanced visualization tools, including Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Scimago Graphica. Our analysis reveals that the field has undergone exponential growth and a distinct paradigm shift, with research focus evolving from initial material synthesis (e.g., high-Z metals for physical dose enhancement) to complex biological regulation (e.g., hypoxia relief, TME regulation). Notably, keywords and trend analysis have identified that the integration of nanoradiosensitizers with immunotherapy has become the frontier of the current research field, such as enhanced immunogenic cell death (ICD) and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Overall, this study highlights the shift of nanoradiosensitizers from material-driven exploration toward mechanism-based biological and translational studies. Future research must prioritize overcoming translational barriers, including biosafety, large-scale manufacturing, and clinical evaluation, to enable the clinical application of radioimmunotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.