ArticlePloS one2026
Physical activity barriers and facilitators in patients awaiting spine surgery: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDegenerative spine conditions and physical inactivity are major public health concerns. Engaging in physical activity before spine surgery may improve postoperative outcomes experienced by patients with lumbar stenosis or lumbar disc herniation. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators to physical activity among patients with degenerative lumbar spine conditions awaiting surgery.
methodsIn this qualitative patient-oriented study, guided by a patient partner who contributed to the development of the interview guide and interpretation of findings, we conducted data-prompted semi-structured interviews (a method in which personalised physical activity information is used to stimulate reflection and discussion), with patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation on a surgical waiting list. Interviews were structured around the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Patient responses were deductively coded to TDF domains and inductively analyzed to identify subthemes. Key domains were determined through researcher consensus based on the frequency and clarity of specific beliefs within each domain.
resultsWe interviewed 18 patients (8 female), 11 with lumbar spinal stenosis and 7 with lumbar disc herniation, with a mean (SD) age of 54.7 (17.3) years. Five key TDF domains were identified: skills, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, environmental context and resources, and emotion. Barriers to physical activity included a lack of physical capacity, pain and other adverse symptoms, potential for negative consequences, inappropriate environment, and negative emotions. Facilitators to physical activity were motivation, appropriate environment, supportive social influences, positive emotions, alternate strategies, and daily physical activity habits.
conclusionsPhysical activity behaviour in patients awaiting spine surgery is shaped by an interplay of physical, emotional and contextual factors. These findings can inform the design of tailored, theory-driven preoperative physical activity interventions, targeting key barriers such as pain, fear of harm, and limited access to resources, while leveraging factors including motivation, professional guidance, social support, and habit formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.