ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Co-Designing a Care Coordination Intervention for People With Motor Neuron Disease: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Motor neuron disease (MND), also known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is a rapidly progressive neurological condition that requires complex multidisciplinary care. Within the United Kingdom, specialist centers provide expert interventions, while day-to-day support often relies on local nonspecialist community health and social care professionals. This is due to the distance between people's homes and specialist centers, as well as the availability of specialist health and social care professionals. This can lead to fragmented communication and emotional, physical, and financial burdens, and it can be time-consuming for people living with MND, their carers, and the health care professionals involved in their care. Despite the recognized need for better care coordination, it remains inadequate in practice, with a current lack of specific evidence-based interventions for achieving this. Objective: The MND Together project aims to address these systemic gaps by (1) developing a national picture of care coordination in England and Wales, (2) identifying barriers and facilitators to coordination within specialist and nonspecialist settings, and (3) co-designing a practical care coordination tool with key stakeholders. Methods: This protocol outlines the co-design of an intervention underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel and the Socioecological Model. First, a mixed methods, multicenter study will be conducted to develop a national picture, comprising focus groups with people living with MND, carers, and health and social care professionals. Second, focused ethnography will be conducted in 5 MND specialist centers and their catchment areas, involving 25 people living with MND, to explore the barriers and facilitators to coordination in practice. Finally, a series of co-design workshops will be conducted to identify key priorities for care coordination and to develop a new intervention, the MND Together tool. Results: The project started in September 2025 and will run until October 2027. Workstream 1 started in December 2025, with recruitment beginning at the first site in February 2026. To date, we have recruited 23 people living with MND and carers as well as 16 health and social care professionals across 4 of the 9 sites. Workstream 1 will end in August 2026, with results published at the end of 2026. Workstream 2 began in May 2026 and will run until February 2027, with results published in the summer of 2027. Workstream 3 will begin in March 2027 and conclude with the co-design intervention developed by late 2027. This will then be piloted in practice. Conclusions: By combining several methodologies with meaningful patient and public involvement and engagement, MND Together seeks to bridge the gap between specialist and community-based services. The MND Together tool aims to improve the quality of care and ensure that expert MND support is accessible as close as possible to every patient's home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.