ArticleBMJ open2026
Biceps tenodesis with 360° suture anchor versus self-locking tenodesis in the absence of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (BLAST-2).
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06772103 (Biceps Tenodesis With 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self-Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biceps Tenodesis With 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self-Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Protocol for a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial (BLAST-2)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is commonly treated with either tenotomy or tenodesis, which provide comparable clinical outcomes but have distinct disadvantages. A novel self-locking biceps tenodesis aims to combine the benefits of both techniques. Comparative evidence in patients without full-thickness rotator cuff tears is limited. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and biceps tenodesis with 360° suture anchor in patients without full-thickness rotator cuff tears. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, double-blinded non-inferiority randomised controlled trial will include 98 patients aged≥40 years with symptomatic LHBT pathology in the absence of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Participants will be recruited between January 2025 and January 2030 and randomly allocated to self-locking biceps tenodesis or biceps tenodesis with 360° suture anchor. The primary outcome is the Constant score at 1 year postoperatively, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the French Committee of Person Protection North-West II (national registration number 2024-A02217-40). Furthermore, the trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06772103). Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06772103.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.