ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2026
Navigating evidence-based recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis.
Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past 3 years key recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis (SSc) have been published, including updated EULAR recommendations and British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines. These recommendations are generally aligned but also reflect differences in the methodology and scope of the responsible organizations. For both EULAR and BSR, the methodology is robust and aligns with recommendations and guidelines developed for other rheumatic conditions and produced by other specialist societies. Advances in treatment and a growing evidence base for management of interstitial lung disease (ILD), a frequent complication of SSc, have informed additional relevant recommendations that include SSc-ILD. Some of these cover a broad range of ILDs that occur across systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including those developed by the ACR-American College of Chest Physicians and the 2025 European Respiratory Society-EULAR clinical-practice guidelines. The American Thoracic Society has also developed recommendations for SSc-ILD. Taken together, a comparison of these published guidelines provides an overview of best practice evidence-based management that is supported by expert opinion and relevant stakeholders. By considering the overlap and similarity in recommendations and highlighting differences in approach and scope, this article helps readers to navigate an evolving treatment landscape of SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42552374What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.