ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The synergy of nutritional risk and iron deficiency as a predictor of mortality in older emergency department patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Older patients in the emergency department (ED) often present with coexisting nutritional risk and iron deficiency (ID). However, this combined risk is frequently underrecognized and inadequately addressed in clinical practice. Objective: To investigate the independent and combined predictive value of nutritional risk and ID for 28-day mortality in older ED patients, and to clarify the underlying pathway-specifically, examining whether hemoglobin (Hb) acts as a mediator or whether direct effects are present. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 443 patients aged ≥ 60 years from the ED resuscitation room. Patients were stratified into four groups based on their modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and ID status: G1, mNUTRIC < 5 without ID; G2, mNUTRIC < 5 with ID; G3, mNUTRIC ≥ 5 without ID; G4, mNUTRIC ≥ 5 with ID. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify independent risk factors for mortality. Mediation analysis was performed to explore potential mechanistic pathways. Results: The overall 28-day mortality rate was 22.8%. Patients with both high nutritional risk and ID (G4) had the highest mortality (42.7%) and a risk 4.9 times greater than the G1 (adjusted HR = 4.901, 95% CI: 2.861-8.394, Conclusion: The coexistence of high nutritional risk and ID exerts a powerful synergistic effect on mortality in older ED patients. Although associated with hemoglobin levels, this synergy appears to be primarily direct, suggesting that mechanisms beyond anemia contribute to the excess mortality. Integrated assessment of this "risk triad" may help identify high-risk patients earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.