ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Venous-significant intracranial hemorrhage in neonatal HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia: imaging phenotypes, diagnostic pitfalls, and prognostic implications.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the therapeutic hypothermia era, intracranial hemorrhage is increasingly detected in term and near-term neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), yet its clinical significance remains heterogeneous and is often oversimplified. This review uses a pattern-based approach for venous system-related intracranial hemorrhage in neonatal HIE, with particular emphasis on cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) and hemorrhagic venous infarction. Magnetic resonance imaging plays a central role in etiologic assessment, with diffusion-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging providing the core parenchymal and hemorrhagic information, while MR venography is most informative when imaging features raise suspicion for venous involvement. Imaging phenotypes that should prompt venous reconsideration include hemorrhagic parenchymal lesions crossing arterial territories and intraventricular hemorrhage accompanied by unilateral thalamic or deep parenchymal hemorrhage. Common pitfalls in neonatal MR venography interpretation-particularly flow-related artifacts-are also highlighted, emphasizing the importance of parenchymal-venographic concordance in avoiding both over- and underdiagnosis of CSVT. Mechanistically, hypoxia-reperfusion injury, endothelial activation, venous stasis, and developmental hemostatic vulnerability may create a milieu in which thrombosis and hemorrhage coexist. Available evidence suggests that long-term outcomes are driven more by associated venous-related parenchymal injury than by small-volume hemorrhage alone, underscoring the importance of pattern-guided imaging interpretation and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.