ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Evaluation of a hybrid asynchronous-synchronous delivery model for family intervention in psychosis: the psychosis REACH program.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The uptake of Family Interventions for psychosis (FIp) in routine settings has been limited across high-, middle-, and low-income countries due to geographic, systemic, and socioeconomic barriers. Psychosis REACH is a FIp that addresses these barriers by using a direct-to-family model co-facilitated by licensed mental health practitioners with expertise in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis and family members with lived experience. While prior delivery relied on in-person training, this approach does not adequately address structural access challenges. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate caregiver outcomes of a hybrid asynchronous-synchronous version of Psychosis REACH consisting of (a) an online course, (b) a live virtual skills workshop, and (c) follow-along skills coaching from a trained family peer (Psychosis REACH Family Ambassador; pRFA). Materials and methods: Psychosis REACH was delivered via a hybrid digital format to 275 caregivers of individuals with psychosis, the majority of whom were parents (61.2%). We evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and participant characteristics, along with outcomes including depression, anxiety, caregiver burden, expressed emotion, attitudes toward psychosis, and self-perceived CBT skillfulness at post-training and 4-month follow-up. Results: Both asynchronous and synchronous components were rated as highly feasible and acceptable. Nearly all participants completed the online course; 85% went on to complete the virtual workshop, of which 66.7% endorsed intention to follow-up with a pRFA. Participants demonstrated significant improvements across multiple domains, including reduced psychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, stigmatizing attitudes, and expressed emotion, along with increased confidence in CBT-informed skills. Discussion: Findings suggest that this hybrid digital training is both acceptable and feasible, offering a promising approach for disseminating evidence-based family support in psychosis. Clinical and educational outcomes were comparable to in-person delivery, underscoring its potential to reduce access barriers for some caregivers. Future research should prioritize randomized trials and active engagement of diverse and underserved families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.