ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
Lévy statistics define anxiety and depression in mice subjected to chronic stress.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current rodent models for anxiety and depression assessment face methodological challenges compromising both scientific rigor and animal welfare. Methods: This study introduced a novel approach using the Lévy flight (LF) statistical method to analyze spontaneous movement in open spaces. We employed three models: Chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), Electric shock stress (ES), and Chronic Restraint Stress (CRS)-utilizing a total of 540 mice for LF fitting. A support vector machine algorithm was applied to distinguish each model group based on the two-dimensional distribution of the variables γ and μ in the LF. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-dimensional Kolmogorov-Smirnov test before and after drug administration. Results: We found that the ES model primarily exhibited anxiety-like behaviors, the CRS model predominantly exhibited depression-like behaviors, and the CUMS model displayed both depression-like and anxiety-like behaviors. All three stress models were suitable for LF fitting, with the distribution of CUMS in the γ-μ plane lying between the ES and CRS groups. To assess the therapeutic effect of fluoxetine (FXT) on CUMS, we excluded the CUMS-resistant mice and performed LF analysis. Following FXT treatment, the mice gradually shifted toward the normal area in the γ-μ plane, with a more pronounced shift toward the depression area observed as the modeling time increased. Discussion: This study identifies a previously unrecognized statistical locomotor pattern in mice with anxiety and depression. By integrating scientific rigor with ethical considerations, this approach also presents a humane paradigm shift in preclinical assessment, accelerating translational breakthroughs in neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.