Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42554215›Full record

ReviewJournal of internal medicine2026

Advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: Biologicals, small-molecular agents, and cell-depleting therapies coming to the clinic.

Ronald van Vollenhoven

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronald van VollenhovenDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-8663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; lupus) remains a particular challenge for the practicing clinician on account of its chronic undulating and unpredictable course, its diverse manifestations, and-until recently-limited treatment options all associated with considerable downsides. However, a major change in this situation is currently taking place. Over the past few years, several new biological therapeutics have been approved for the treatment of SLE (belimumab and anifrolumab) or specifically for its renal organ manifestation (obinutuzumab), along with one new small molecular treatment for the latter (voclosporin). Several additional biologicals (litifilimab and dapirolizumab) and small molecules (deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, and cerenimod) are in late-stage clinical development. Moreover, multiple case series and case reports have been published in the past years demonstrating excellent individual results following treatments aimed at fully depleting B lymphocytes using chimeric antigen receptor bearing T cells (CAR-T cells) or bi-specific T-cell engagers. These reports have raised hopes that not only solid disease control, but also a more profound state of immunological reset-deep remission-can be attained in at least some patients. In this narrative review, these developments will be described, emphasizing both the promises and the challenges they bring about, leading into some predictions of where they may lead to. A reasonable expectation is that in the coming 1-2 years, several additional biologicals and small-molecular agents will be approved for the treatment of lupus. The most important conclusion is that the future for our patients with lupus looks brighter than ever before.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicHumansLymphocyte DepletionBiological Productsadvances, biologicals, cell therapies, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLElupus), targeted synthetic drugs, treatment

Identifiers

PMID42554215
PMCPMC13569121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.