ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
CRISPR/Cas system as a novel therapeutic strategy to combat multi-drug-resistant bacteria.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has diminished the effectiveness of present antibiotics, posing a huge threat to global community health and economic stability. This study investigates the CRISPR-Cas framework's potential as a cutting-edge tactic to fight antimicrobial resistance. Current applications, limitations, and prospective future uses are analyzed. CRISPR antimicrobial strategies, which bring together the latest developments in gene-targeting strategies, engineered delivery platforms, and translational applications to fight multidrug-resistant pathogens. CRISPR technology is different from traditional antimicrobial treatments that target general antimicrobial resistance genes, instead allowing targets to be eliminated specifically by sequence, while retaining beneficial microbial communities, which has the potential to be a transformative precision antimicrobial treatment. Nevertheless, there is still a need for optimization of delivery systems, specificity of targets, biosafety, and regulations to ensure successful clinical translation, especially given their amazing advances. Recent research confirms that CRISPR-based mechanisms also affect different bacterial species, including Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species, playing a key function in averting the emergence of resistance genes in these bacteria. Changes to CRISPR loci affect how resistance genes are targeted in ESKAPE pathogens, and CRISPR-Cas9 successfully lowers resistance by focusing on genes like tetM and ermB. A promising application of CRISPR-Cas systems in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the precise targeting of plasmid-borne mcr-1 resistance genes and other mobile genetic elements that facilitate the dissemination of colistin resistance. But the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas is diminished in some bacterial strains due to variations in their CRISPR loci. Enhancing transformation approaches and minimizing off-target impacts are critical challenges to confirm the precision and safety of CRISPR-based mechanisms in therapeutic applications. Advances in these areas are likely to continue to enable the development of next-generation CRISPR therapeutics for the effective management of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42554845What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.