ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Standardised superior vena cava isolation with a balloon-in-basket pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and acute safety of two procedural workflows in 53 consecutive patients.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePulsed-field ablation (PFA) is established for pulmonary vein isolation, but data on superior vena cava (SVC) isolation are limited. We assessed the feasibility and acute safety of SVC isolation with the Volt™ balloon-in-basket PFA catheter using two sequentially applied standardised workflows.
methodsRetrospective single-centre series of 53 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation with adjunctive SVC isolation. Workflow 1 (n = 28) used phrenic-nerve pacing and tailored energy; Workflow 2 (n = 25) used low-energy PFA only without phrenic pacing; both shared mapping-guided sinus-node sparing and a 20-second flow-preservation manoeuvre. A pre-specified within-platform sensitivity analysis controlled for a concurrent catheter iteration (20 January 2026).
resultsAcute SVC isolation was achieved in all 53 patients (100%, 95% CI 93.3-100%). No phrenic-nerve injury and no permanent atrioventricular block occurred (0/53); one Workflow 1 patient had transient junctional rhythm that resolved spontaneously. Workflow-attributable differences were confined to SVC-specific metrics and persisted within a single catheter-platform era: Workflow 2 used low-energy applications exclusively, required more applications (median 5 vs. 4; p = 0.010), and had a longer SVC isolation time (10.7 vs. 8.5 min; p = 0.006). Shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times in Workflow 2 did not persist within a single catheter-platform era (p = 0.94, p = 0.35). Median follow-up 84 days (data censored 1 July 2026).
conclusionsSVC isolation with the Volt™ balloon-in-basket PFA catheter is feasible with favourable acute safety. A simplified low-energy-only protocol without phrenic-nerve pacing is a reasonable alternative to a phrenic-paced tailored-energy protocol. Durability and rhythm outcomes require dedicated follow-up study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42554910What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.