Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555367›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Exploring the potential of large language models in nutrition behavior prediction: evidence from college students.

Misha M Madhavan, Satyapriya, Subhashree Sahu, Praveen Koovalamkadu Velayudhan, Siva Smitha, Arjun Prasad Verma, Vikash Pawariya, Sukanya Barua, Girijesh Singh Mahra, Sitaram Bishnoi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Misha M MadhavanICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
SatyapriyaICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Subhashree SahuICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Praveen Koovalamkadu VelayudhanICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Siva SmithaCoA, Vellayani, Kerala Agricultural University, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Arjun Prasad VermaCoA, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, UP, India.
Vikash PawariyaCoA, Nagaur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Sukanya BaruaICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Girijesh Singh MahraICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sitaram BishnoiICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Manjeet Singh NainICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Venu LeninICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Monika WasonICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rajarshi Roy BurmanIndian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in behavioral nutrition is expanding rapidly to predict the behavioral data. Recent developments in LLM-assisted analytical tools have opened new possibilities for analyzing survey datasets and exploring behavioral patterns related to nutrition. Objectives: The study aims to evaluate the ability of a large language model-assisted analytical workflow to predict healthy eating behavior scores using survey data collected from undergraduate students. The study also compares the predictive performance of the LLM-assisted workflow with a baseline OLS regression model and examines how prompt-based conditioning using different dataset sizes influences prediction accuracy. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design using primary survey data collected from 914 undergraduate students from agricultural universities in India between December 2024 and February 2025. The Healthy Eating Behavior (HEB) scale was used to assess behavioral outcomes. The dataset was analyzed using an LLM-assisted analytical environment (ChatGPT-4o), where the model was prompted to generate predicted HEB scores across different training-test splits. The predicted scores were compared with observed survey scores using statistical tests. Additionally, qualitative analysis examined if the model's predicted determinants of healthy eating behavior were aligned with the previous literature. Results: The results indicate that predictions generated using the LLM-assisted analytical workflow gradually converged toward the observed survey scores as the size of the training dataset increased. When a larger proportion of the data was used for training, the predicted scores did not differ significantly from the observed mean scores. However, predictive accuracy could be further strengthened using larger and more diverse datasets. The qualitative analysis also revealed similarity between the determinants of healthy eating behavior identified by the model and those reported in prior studies. Conclusion: The findings suggest that LLM-assisted analytical tools can support exploratory prediction tasks in behavioral nutrition research when sufficient training data are available.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebehavioral nutritionbehavior predictionChatGPThealthy eating behaviorlarge language modelLLMsurvey data

Identifiers

PMID42555367
PMCPMC13333345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.