ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
SLJ is associated with multiple field-based fitness indicators in young adult males.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Health data equity emphasizes the need for accessible, low-cost, and scalable indicators that can reduce barriers to health assessment when applied within clearly defined populations and contexts. However, many existing fitness and health evaluation methods rely on resource-intensive measurements, limiting their applicability in large-scale or under-resourced settings. The standing long jump (SLJ), a simple field-based test of lower-limb explosive power, may serve as a practical and scalable indicator of physical fitness among male college students. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 7,842 male college students. SLJ performance was assessed alongside key health-related fitness indicators, including cardiorespiratory fitness (1000-m run), muscular endurance (pull-ups), flexibility (sit-and-reach), and body composition (BMI). Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine associations between SLJ and these variables. Results: SLJ performance was significantly associated with all measured variables ( Conclusion: As a low-cost, scalable, and easily implementable measure, SLJ has potential utility for large-scale fitness assessment among male college students. Its associations with multiple domains of physical fitness support its use as an accessible field-based assessment tool in university or resource-limited settings. Given that the present study included only male college students, the findings should not be generalized to female students, other age groups, or non-college populations without further validation. These findings contribute to the development of accessible and data-efficient strategies for context-specific health and fitness assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.