Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555479›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Environment and health impacts of synthetic food packaging: materials, synthesis, causes, and potential solutions.

Md Amir Khasru, Tarikul Islam, Sayam, Md Shakirul Islam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Md Amir KhasruDepartment of Yarn Engineering, Barishal Textile Engineering College Barishal 8200 Bangladesh.
Tarikul IslamDepartment of Textile Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology Jashore 7408 Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-378X
SayamDepartment of Fabric Engineering, Barishal Textile Engineering College Barishal 8200 Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4527-6027
Md Shakirul IslamDepartment of Textile Engineering, Chemistry, and Science, North Carolina State University Raleigh NC 27696 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1089-9980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food-packaging materials protect food from spoilage by enhancing its shelf life, safety, and overall quality. Currently, a major portion of food-packaging materials are made from fossil-based synthetic polymers due to the cost and ease of processing; however, they have far-reaching consequences on the environment and human health. Their multifaceted impact on the environment is not only limited to carbon footprint throughout their life cycle but also worsened by microplastic release affecting the aquatic systems. The non-biodegradability of such petroleum-based polymers is exacerbating the waste generation upon disposal, negatively affecting soil fertility and raising massive landfill issues. The processing materials and functional additives that can migrate into food and pose toxicological risks also raise concerns. This state-of-the-art review briefly outlines the traditional production processes of available commercial food-packaging materials from different polymeric materials and additives prior to explaining their consequences and broader impacts on the environment and human health in detail. It further highlights promising alternatives, emphasizing biodegradable and renewable polymers paired with safer bio-based additives to maintain the functional performance. The paper concludes with a forward-looking perspective on advancing sustainable and environmentally responsible packaging solutions across industrial sectors.

Identifiers

PMID42555479
PMCPMC13430732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.